 | Our demo is moving to another editor for the next revision. There is a texture I want them to assess, but describing it as strange or metallic feels too vague to be useful. I would rather send a precise observation than prescribe a fix. I would begin with the exact filename and revision date. I would include timestamps covering the part that needs attention. I came across <a href=https://musicartifactfix.top>suno shimmer</a> as a possible term while reading about generated audio, although I am not sure it fits this particular sound. The note should separate observation from interpretation. I would mention the listening setup used for the assessment. The editor should receive both the source and the relevant excerpt. Specific processing choices can wait until the editor has listened. What else belongs in a concise report like this? |
[返信]